What happens to compensation claims when a party accepts late performance of a contract?

Study for the CA Foundation Business Law Exam. Practice with multiple-choice questions, review detailed explanations, and ace your exam!

When a party accepts late performance of a contract, claims for damages may be limited because the acceptance can imply a waiver of the right to seek full compensation for the breach caused by the delay. This acceptance indicates that the party recognizes the breach but chooses to continue with the contract nonetheless.

In many legal interpretations, accepting late performance does not necessarily eliminate the right to claim damages, but it may constrain the scope or amount of those claims. The accepting party may still be entitled to some compensation for the inconvenience or losses suffered due to the delay, but they may not be able to pursue all available claims as if no breach had occurred.

Other options do not align with standard legal principles. Initiating new compensation claims is generally not appropriate once a party has accepted the late performance. Declaring all claims as invalid contradicts the principle of contract law that maintains rights to seek damages under specific circumstances. Lastly, disregarding the delay entirely would not accurately reflect the repercussions of a breach of contract, as delays can cause real impacts and consequences that the law recognizes.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy